|    Quagga
  mussels have a long history of invasion and have successfully established in
  Great Britain (1824), The Netherlands (1827), The Czech Republic (1893),
  Sweden (1920), Italy (1973), the Great Lakes in the USA (1988), and
  California (2008).   Quagga mussels
  were first found in the USA in the Great Lakes in 1989, Nevada in 2007, and
  California in 2008. Ballast water discharge from transoceanic ships is
  thought to be responsible for the long distance spread of zebra and quagga
  mussels from their original home ranges in eastern Europe.  Short distance spread between fresh
  waterways within countries most likely occurs via the movement of
  recreational boats.  This occurs when
  boats are not cleaned and dried adequately and contaminated watercraft are
  then moved from infested waterways to pristine water bodies where mussels are
  accidentally introduced.  These
  mussels can survive for 3-5 days out of water without suffering lethal
  desiccation.
          Where
  quagga and zebra mussels co-exist, quagga mussels appear to outcompete zebra
  mussels, and quagga mussels can colonize to depths greater than those
  achieved by zebra mussels and are more tolerant of colder water
  temperatures.  For example, in Lake
  Michigan, zebra mussels made up 98.3% of mussels in 2000, by 2005 quagga
  mussels represented 97.7% of collected mussels.  Zebra mussels were found at densities of around 899 per square
  meter, but quagga mussels now dominate at 7,790 mussels per square
  meter.  Quagga mussels have been found
  at depths of up to 540 feet in Lake Michigan where they filter feed year
  round.Consequently, quagga mussels may end up being the more problematic of
  these two mussel species in California.
 Mussel invasions have had
  catastrophic impacts in the ecosystems in which they have established.  These organisms clog water intake
  structures (e.g., pipes and screens), which greatly increases maintenance
  costs for water treatment and power plants. 
  Recreational activities on lakes and rivers are adversely affected as
  mussels accumulate on docks, buoys, boat hulls, anchors, and beaches can
  become heavily encrusted.
          The
  shells of both mussel species are sharp and can cut people, which forces the
  wearing of shoes when walking along infested beaches or over rocks. Mussels
  adhering to boat hulls can increase drag, affect boat steering, and clog
  engines, all of which can lead to overheating and engine malfunctions.  Ecological problems also result from
  mussel invasions.  Zebra and quagga
  mussels can kill native freshwater mussels in two ways: (1) attachment to the
  shells of native species can kill them, and (2) these invasive species can
  outcompete native mussels and other filter feeding invertebrates for
  food.  This problem has been
  particularly acute in some areas of the USA that have a very rich diversity
  of native freshwater mussel species.          The
  encrusting of lake and river bottoms can displace native aquatic arthropods
  that need soft sediments for burrowing. In the Great Lakes this had lead to
  the collapse of amphipod populations that fish rely on for food and the health
  of fish populations has been severely affected.          These
  mussels have been associated with avian botulism outbreaks in the Great Lakes
  that have caused the mortality of tens of thousands of birds.  Because of their filter feeding habit, it
  has been estimated that these mussels can bioaccumlate organic pollutants in
  their tissues by as much as 300,000 times when compared to concentrations in
  the water in which they are living. 
  Consequently, these pollutants can biomagnify as they are passed up
  the food chain when contaminated mussels are eaten by predators (e.g., fish
  and crayfish), who in turn are eaten by other organisms (e.g., recreational
  fishermen who eat contaminated fish). 
  High mussel populations can increase water acidity and decrease
  concentrations of dissolved oxygen.         
  Invasions by quagga and zebra mussels have been documented as having
  some positive affects on receiving ecosystems.  For example, filtration of water by mussels as they extract
  food removes particulate matter.  This
  filtration has improved water clarity, and reduced the eutrophication of
  polluted lakes.  In some instances
  these improvements may have benefited local fishing industries.  Conversely, improved water clarity allows
  penetration of light to greater depths which can alter the species
  composition of aquatic plant communities and associated ecosystems.  This improved water quality is thought to
  aid algal blooms that get washed ashore where they rot making recreational
  beaches unusable.  Also, the highly
  efficient removal of phytoplankton can deprive other aquatic species of food.         
  Invasion success in some areas of California may be affected by water
  chemistry. Waterways around the Sierra Nevada mountains may have insufficient
  calcium (an element needed for shell growth) and some lakes in northeast
  California may be too salty for mussel survival.  However, the general consensus is that most freshwater ways in
  California will be accommodating to zebra and quagga mussels.     REFERENCES:   Alteration of the Freshwater Ecosystem, An
  Overview.  2016.  U. S. Army Corps of
  Engineers (PDF).    Angling club closes down at 'clean' Salford
  Quays.  2011.  B.B.C. News. 19 December.   Benson,
  Amy.  2009.   Zebra mussel FAQs.  Florida biology.usgs.gov.   Blažka,
  F.  1893.  Do Čech zavlečená slávka: Dreissena polymorpha Pall.   Vesmír (in Czech). 22 (15):  177–178.    Borcherding,
  J.  1991.  The annual reproductive cycle of the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha Pallas in
  lakes.  Oecologia. 87
  (2):  208–218.   Bowman,
  Sarah.  2021.  Have
  an aquarium? Here are the five things to know about invasive zebra mussels in
  moss balls.   The Indianapolis Star. 
  16 November.    British waterways fight invasion by Russian zebra
  mussels.  2011.  B.B.C. News. 4 August.    Case Study: 
  Zebra Mussel.  2009.  United States Department Of  State. 
  The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs.
  2001-2009.state.gov.   Connelly,
  N. A.;  C. R. O'Neill Jr.,  B. A. 
  Knuth  & T. L.  Brown. 
  2007.  Economic impacts of zebra
  mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation
  facilities.  Environ Management. 40
  (1):  105–12.   Drake,
  John M. & Jonathan M. Bossenbroek. 
  2004.  The Potential
  Distribution of zebra mussels in the United States.   BioScience 54 (10).    Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771).  2013.   World Register of Marine Species.. Feb 25, 2017.    Effler,
  Steven W., Carol M. Brooks, Keith Whitehead, Bruce Wagner, Susan M. Doerr,
  MaryGail Perkins, Clifford A. Siegfried, Leigh Walrath & Raymond P. Canale.  1996. 
  Impact of Zebra Mussel Invasion on River Water Quality.  Water Environment Research Vol. 68 (2:  205–214.   Garton, D.
  W.;  D. J. Berg,  A. M. Stoeckmann  &  W. R. Hagg.  1993.   Biology of recent invertebrate invading
  species in the Great Lakes: The spiny water flea, Bythotrephes cederstoemi, and the zebra mussel, Dreissena
  polymorpha.  In McKnight, B. N.
  (ed.). Biological pollution: The control and impact of invasive exotic
  species.  Indianapolis, Indiana:
  Indiana Academy of Science. pp. 63–84.    Hoddle,
  M. S.  2010.  Quagga and Zebra
  Mussels.  Center For Invasive
  Species Research, Univ. of Calif.
  Riverside.    Horsák,
  M.,  L. Juřičková, L. Beran,
  T. Čejka  &  L. Dvořák.  2010.   Komentovaný
  seznam měkkýšů zjištěných ve volné přírodě
  České a Slovenské republiky. [Annotated list of mollusc species recorded
  outdoors in the Czech and Slovak Republics]. 
  Malacologica Bohemoslovaca, Suppl. 1:  1–37.   Janega,
  James.  2008.  Botulism
  takes fatal toll on thousands of Great Lakes birds.  Chicago Tribune. 
  28 September.    Lori,
  Elisabetta & Simone Cianfanelli.  2006. 
  New records of Dreissena polymorpha
  (Pallas, 1771) (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) from Central
  Italy.  Aquatic Invasions. 1
  (4):  281–283.    Mackie,
  G.; W. Gibbons,  B. Muncaster  & L. Gray.  1989.  The Zebra Mussel,
  Dreissena polymorpha: A
  synthesis of European Experiences and a preview for North America
  (Report).  Ontario Ministry of
  Environment.    Manitoba family spots 'dark clumps' of zebra
  mussels at Grand Beach.  2017.  C.B.C. News Manitoba.  5 June.   Molloya,
  Daniel P.; Alexander Y. Karatayevb; Lyubov E. Burlakovab; Dina P.
  Kurandinac;  & Franck
  Laruellea.  1997.  Natural enemies of zebra mussels:
  Predators, parasites, and ecological competitors.  Reviews in Fisheries Science. 5 (1):  27–97.    Mollusca Slovenska.  1991.  [The Slovak
  molluscs].  VEDA vydavateľstvo
  Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava, 344 pp.    Nicholls,
  Kenneth H.  &  Gordon J. Hopkins.  1993. 
  Recent Changes in Lake Erie (North Shore) Phytoplankton: Cumulative  Impacts
  of Phosphorus Loading Reductions and the Zebra Mussel Introduction.  Journal of Great Lakes Research. 19
  (4):  637–647.    Oppi,
  E.  1973.  Dreissena polymorpha
  (Pallas) nuovamente in Italia. (Bivalvia, Dreissenidae).  Mem. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Verona (in
  Italian). 20:  45–49.    Province redoubles fight against zebra mussels.  2015. 
  Winnipeg Sun.  28 May,   Quagga and Zebra Mussels Incident
  Description.  2018.  California Department of
  Fish & Wildlife.  5 June.    Sagoff,
  M.  2003.  What's Wrong with
  Exotic Species?  (Report).  College Park, Maryland: Institute for
  Philosophy and Public Policy, Maryland School of Public Affairs.  13 pp.   Schloesser, Don
  W. & Thomas F. Nalepa.  1994.   Dramatic
  decline of unionid bivalves in offshore waters of western Lake Erie after
  infestation by the zebra mussel, Dreissena
  polymorpha.  USGS
  Great Lakes Science Center.    Stimers,
  M. J.  2008.  Zebra Mussel (Dreissena
  polymorpha) Invasion into the Upper Platte River: Using GIS and
  Genetic Algorithm Rule-set Prediction to Model Spread.  The Pennsylvania Geographer 45 (2):  57–70.    Stoler,
  Steve.  2011.   Water
  district braces for North Texas drought crisis.  2012. 
  WFAA.com.  24 April.    Strayer,
  David L.  2009.  Twenty Years of Zebra Mussels: Lessons
  from the Mollusk That Made Headlines. 
  Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Vol. 7 (3):  135–141.   The
  National Atlas of the United States of America.  2009.  Zebra Mussels.  Nationalatlas.gov.    Van Damme,
  D.  2014.   Dreissena
  polymorpha.   IUCN
  Red List of Threatened Species.    Walker,
  Tim.  1991.   Dreissena Disaster:  Scientists battle an invasion of zebra mussels.  Science News 4 May 1991   Werner,
  S.  2005.   Strong impact of wintering waterbirds on
  zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha)
  populations at Lake Constance, Germany.  Freshwater Biology. 50 (8): 
  1412–1426.   Zebra Mussel Discovered in North Dakota.  2020.  North Dakota Game and Fish
  Department.  1 July.   Zebra mussel = Invasive species: Minnesota
  DNR.  1999.   Dnr.state.mn.us. 1999-08-24.   Zebra Mussels Overwhelm U.S. Waterways in the
  Great Lakes Region and Beyond – Copper Screens and Coatings Provide a
  Solution to this $500 million Problem. 
  2009.  Copper Development
  Association. 30 July.    |